Skip to main content

Sub-photospheric shocks in relativistic explosions

Image: In the most common type of gamma-ray burst, illustrated here, a dying massive star forms a black hole (left), which drives a particle jet into space. Light across the spectrum arises from hot gas near the black hole, collisions within the jet, and from the jet's interaction with its surroundings. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center


Astrophysical explosions and jets generate shock waves, which produce radiation. Their radiative properties are determined by the dissipation mechanism that sustains the velocity jump in the shock and by its ability to generate nonthermal particles.

A recent paper (Beloborodov 2016) examines the mechanism of internal shocks in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) that occur before the GRB jets become transparent to radiation. The approach and some of the results may also be of interest for other explosions, e.g. in novae or supernovae.

Sub-photospheric shocks can produce neutrino emission and affect the observed photospheric radiation from the explosion. Shocks develop from internal compressive waves and can be of different types depending on the composition of the flow:
  1. Shocks in 'photon gas' with small plasma inertial mass have a unique structure determined by the 'force-free' condition -- zero radiation flux in the plasma rest frame. Radiation dominance over plasma inertia suppresses formation of collisionless shocks mediated by collective electromagnetic fields. 
  2. Strong collisionless subshocks develop in the opaque flow if it is sufficiently magnetized. The author evaluates the critical magnetization for this to happen. The collisionless subshock is embedded in a thicker radiation-mediated shock structure.
  3. Shocks in outflows carrying a free neutron component involve dissipation through nuclear collisions. At large optical depths, the shock thickness is comparable to the neutron free path, with an embedded radiation-mediated or collisionless subshock.
The author finds that sub-photospheric shocks are capable of generating high-energy particles and boosting the photon number carried by the outflow, and that the shock type changes as the outflow expands toward its photosphere. Strong e± pair creation occurs as the shock wave approaches the photosphere. Then the e±-dressed shock carries the photosphere with it up to two decades in radius, producing a strong observed pulse of nonthermal photospheric radiation.

  • Beloborodov 2016 (preprint) - Sub-photospheric shocks in relativistic explosions - (arXiv)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘Monster’ Planet Discovery Challenges Formation Theory

Artist’s illustration of a "hot Jupiter". Image Credit: NASA/CXC/M. Weiss A new research presents the discovery of NGTS-1b, a hot-Jupiter transiting an early M-dwarf host in a P~2.6 days orbit discovered as part of the Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS). The planet has a mass of M~0.8 M(jupiter) making it the most massive planet ever discovered transiting an M-dwarf. NGTS-1b is the third transiting giant planet found around an M-dwarf, reinforcing the notion that close-in gas giants can form and migrate similar to the known population of hot Jupiters around solar type stars. The existence of the 'monster' planet, 'NGTS-1b', challenges theories of planet formation which state that a planet of this size could not be formed around such a small star. According to these theories, small stars can readily form rocky planets but do not gather enough material together to form Jupiter-sized planets. Such massive planets were not thought to exist ar...

ORBITAL PERIODS OF THE PLANETS

For orbital period generally we refer to the sidereal period, that is the temporal cycle that it takes an object to make a full orbit, relative to the stars. This is the orbital period in an inertial (non-rotating) frame of reference (365,25 days for the earth).

CONSTRAINTS ON THE LOCATION OF A POSSIBLE 9TH PLANET

Image: The six most distant known objects in the solar system with orbits exclusively beyond Neptune (magenta) all mysteriously line up in a single direction. Such an orbital alignment can only be maintained by some outside force, Batygin and Brown say. Their paper argues that a planet with 10 times the mass of the earth in a distant eccentric orbit anti-aligned with the other six objects (orange) is required to maintain this configuration. Credit: Caltech The astronomers have noticed some of the dwarf planets and other small, icy objects tend to follow orbits that cluster together. To explain the unusual distribution of these Kuiper Belt objects, several authors have advocated the existence of a superEarth planet in the outer solar system ( planet Nine or planet X ).