Skip to main content

Importance of Supernovae in the Enrichment of Planetary Systems

Figure: Called the Veil Nebula, the debris is one of the best-known supernova remnants, deriving its name from its delicate, draped filamentary structures. This view is a mosaic of six Hubble pictures of a small area roughly two light-years across, covering only a tiny fraction of the nebula’s vast structure. Credit: NASA/ESA/Hubble Heritage Team


The presence and abundance of short lived radioisotopes in chondritic meteorites implies that the Sun formed in the vicinity of one or more massive stars that exploded as supernovae (SNe).



Massive stars are more likely to form in massive star clusters (>1000 M⊙) than lower mass clusters. However, photoevaporation of protoplanetary discs from massive stars and dynamical interactions with passing stars can inhibit planet formation in clusters with radii of ∼1 pc.

In a recent paper (Nicholson & Parker 2016) the authors investigate whether low-mass (50 - 200 M⊙) star clusters containing one or two massive stars are a more likely avenue for early Solar system enrichment as they are more dynamically quiescent.

They analyze N-body simulations of the evolution of these low-mass clusters and find that a similar fraction of stars experience supernova enrichment than in high mass clusters, despite their lower densities.

This is due to two-body relaxation, which causes a significant expansion before the first supernova even in clusters with relatively low initial densities.  However, because of the high number of low mass clusters containing one or two massive stars, the absolute number of enriched stars is the same, if not higher than for more populous clusters.

Their results show that direct enrichment of protoplanetary discs from supernovae occurs as frequently in low mass clusters containing one or two massive stars (>20 M⊙) as in more populous star clusters (1000 M⊙).

This relaxes the constraints on the direct enrichment scenario and therefore the birth environment of the Solar System.

  • Nicholson & Parker 2016 (accepted in MNRAS) - Supernova enrichment of planetary systems in low-mass star clusters (arXiv)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A UNIVERSE WITHOUT A CENTER?

Image Credit: Eugenio Bianchi, Carlo Rovelli & Rocky Kolb. According to the standard theories of cosmology, there is no center of the universe. In a conventional explosion, material expand out from a central point and the instinct suggests that with the Big Bang happened something similar. But the Big Bang was not an explosion like that at all: it was an explosion of space, not an explosion in space . The Big Bang happened everywhere in the Universe.

UNIVERSE IS FINITE OR INFINITE?

Art by Moonrunner Design   At present there is no answer to this question. However I will try to list the hypothesys currently on the table with related issues.

New research looks at how ‘cosmic web’ of filaments alters star formation in galaxies

Cosmic Web. Credit: NASA Astronomer Gregory Rudnick sees the universe crisscrossed by something like an interstellar superhighway system. Filaments — the strands of aggregated matter that stretch millions of light years across the universe to connect galaxy clusters — are the freeways. “Galaxies will flow along filaments from less dense parts of the universe to more dense parts of the universe, kind of like cars flowing down a highway to the big city. In this case, they are going toward big clusters, being pulled by the gravity of those large concentrations of matter,” he said. “I’m interested in how galaxies are affected by the regions in which they live,” Rudnick said. “Filaments are the first place where galaxies come into contact with higher density regions of the universe. If a galaxy in a ‘rural’ part of the universe enters a dense part, I want to know how its properties change — for example, does it change the number of stars it forms, or does its shape get altered? Us...