Skip to main content

CONSTRAINTS ON THE LOCATION OF A POSSIBLE 9TH PLANET

Image: The six most distant known objects in the solar system with orbits exclusively beyond Neptune (magenta) all mysteriously line up in a single direction. Such an orbital alignment can only be maintained by some outside force, Batygin and Brown say. Their paper argues that a planet with 10 times the mass of the earth in a distant eccentric orbit anti-aligned with the other six objects (orange) is required to maintain this configuration. Credit: Caltech

The astronomers have noticed some of the dwarf planets and other small, icy objects tend to follow orbits that cluster together. To explain the unusual distribution of these Kuiper Belt objects, several authors have advocated the existence of a superEarth planet in the outer solar system (planet Nine or planet X).


The prediction is based on detailed mathematical modeling and computer simulations, not direct observation. It has recently been proposed that a 10 Mearth object with an orbit of 700 AU semi major axis and 0.6 eccentricity can explain the observed distribution of Kuiper Belt objects around Sedna, a large minor planet in the outer reaches of the Solar System that was, as of 2015, at a distance of about 86 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, about three times as far as Neptune.

Figure 1: Allowed zone for P9. The red zone (C14) is excluded by the analysis of the Cassini data up to 2014. The pink zone (C20) is how much this zone can be enlarged by extending the Cassini data to 2020. The green zone is the most probable zone for P9 (v ∈ [108◦:129◦]), with maximum reduction of the residuals at v = 117.8 ◦ (blue dot P9). The white zone is the uncertainty zone where the P9 perturbation is too faint to be detected. Credit: (Fienga et al. 2016)

In a recent paper (Fienga et al 2016) the authors try to obtain informations about the position of the planet X analyzing the Saturn orbit data obtained thanks to the tracking of the Cassini spacecraft during its exploration of the Saturnian system. According to their analysis the allowed zone for the actual position of the planet X are those shown in Figure 1.



  • Fienga et al. 2016 - Constraints on the location of a possible 9th planet derived from the Cassini data (arXiv)
  • Planet X - (NASA) (Wikipedia)

Etichette:

Comments

  1. Liga 1 2 3 2015 2016February 23, 2016 at 11:36 AM

    SOME ONE PREDICT NEPTUNE MAKE THIS BUT IF SO NEPTUNE IS MOVING SO WILL NOT BE THERE AND ALL WILL BE A VERY BIG TIME COINCIDENCE IF NEPTUNE CREATE ALL THE ORBITS LIKE THOSE

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CONTAMINATION BY SUPERNOVAE IN GLOBULAR CLUSTERS

Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO)/Alexandra Angelich (NRAO/AUI/NSF) Only a small amount of the supernovae products remains trapped within globular clusters and this "catch" only occurs in the most massive cases (mass cluster ≥ 10^6 solar masses).
Post a Comment
Read more

GAMMA-RAY EMISSION FROM THE SNR HB3

Image: At a distance of about 20,000 light years, G292.0+1.8 is one of only three supernova remnants in the Milky Way known to contain large amounts of oxygen. These oxygen-rich supernovas are of great interest to astronomers because they are one of the primary sources of the heavy elements (that is, everything other than hydrogen and helium) necessary to form planets and people. The X-ray image from Chandra shows a rapidly expanding, intricately structured, debris field that contains, along with oxygen (yellow and orange), other elements such as magnesium (green) and silicon and sulfur (blue) that were forged in the star before it exploded. Credit: NASA/CXC/SAO The processes of particles acceleration to very high energies from the supernova shock region and diffusion in the interstellar medium of such particles has not been well understood so far. Gamma-ray observations in the GeV regime are a powerful probe of these mechanisms
Post a Comment
Read more

A UNIVERSE WITHOUT A CENTER?

Image Credit: Eugenio Bianchi, Carlo Rovelli & Rocky Kolb. According to the standard theories of cosmology, there is no center of the universe. In a conventional explosion, material expand out from a central point and the instinct suggests that with the Big Bang happened something similar. But the Big Bang was not an explosion like that at all: it was an explosion of space, not an explosion in space . The Big Bang happened everywhere in the Universe.
Post a Comment
Read more