Skip to main content

STELLAR WIND NEAR MASSIVE BLACK HOLES

Image: X-rays from Chandra in blue and infrared emission from the Hubble Space Telescope in red and yellow. The inset shows a close-up view of Sgr A* in X-rays only, covering a region half a light year wide. The diffuse X-ray emission is from hot gas captured by the black hole and being pulled inwards. This hot gas originates from winds produced by a disk-shaped distribution of young massive stars observed in infrared observations. Credit: X-ray: NASA/UMass/D.Wang et al., IR: NASA/STScI

Within the central tenth of a parsec in the middle of our galaxy there is a concentration of young stars (S-stars) that interact with a supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*).


The S-stars in the galactic center are thought to be massive, early B-type stars and therefore should exhibit hot stellar winds. These winds provide gaseous material that can be accreted by the black hole which is thought to be the source of X-ray emission close to Sgr A*.

Image: Morgan-Keenan-Kellman spectral classification of main-sequence stars (Sun - type G).
Credit: LucasVB / Wikimedia.
In contrast to gas, the orbits of the stars are governed by gravitation only and therefore provide an excellent tracer for the gravitational potential in our Galactic center. This unique setup provides the best measurement of the mass of a black hole to date and unambiguously confirms the existence of a supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy.

In a recent paper (Lutzgendorf et al 2016), the authors simulate the gravitational physics, stellar evolution and hydrodynamics of the S-stars orbiting the supermassive black hole, and they use this framework to determine the amount of gas that is accreted onto the black hole.

Image: snapshots at 6 different times in the simulation. The images are centered on the black hole (white cross). The initial position of the stars are marked in the first panel with green circles. Credit: Lutzgendorf et al 2016.

They found that the accretion rate is sensitive to the wind properties of the S-stars, and that the simulations are consistent with the observed accretion rate of Sgr A* (~10^{-6} solar masses/year) only if the stars exhibit high wind massloss rates that are comparable with those of evolved 7-10 Myr old stars with masses of M=19-25 solar masses. This result is in contrast with observations that have shown that these stars are rather young, main-sequence B-stars.
The authors conclude that the S-stars in their present stage are not the main contributors to the accretion rate of Sgr A* and the inflow of gas from the massive O-stars (located farther from Sgr A*) is needed.

(Animation of the simulation - Lutzgendorf et al 2016)

The paper (Lutzgendorf et al 2016) is available online and is published in the MNRAS. >>
http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03304
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/456/4/3645.abstract
Etichette:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘Monster’ Planet Discovery Challenges Formation Theory

Artist’s illustration of a "hot Jupiter". Image Credit: NASA/CXC/M. Weiss A new research presents the discovery of NGTS-1b, a hot-Jupiter transiting an early M-dwarf host in a P~2.6 days orbit discovered as part of the Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS). The planet has a mass of M~0.8 M(jupiter) making it the most massive planet ever discovered transiting an M-dwarf. NGTS-1b is the third transiting giant planet found around an M-dwarf, reinforcing the notion that close-in gas giants can form and migrate similar to the known population of hot Jupiters around solar type stars. The existence of the 'monster' planet, 'NGTS-1b', challenges theories of planet formation which state that a planet of this size could not be formed around such a small star. According to these theories, small stars can readily form rocky planets but do not gather enough material together to form Jupiter-sized planets. Such massive planets were not thought to exist ar...
Post a Comment
Read more

ORBITAL PERIODS OF THE PLANETS

For orbital period generally we refer to the sidereal period, that is the temporal cycle that it takes an object to make a full orbit, relative to the stars. This is the orbital period in an inertial (non-rotating) frame of reference (365,25 days for the earth).
Post a Comment
Read more

CONSTRAINTS ON THE LOCATION OF A POSSIBLE 9TH PLANET

Image: The six most distant known objects in the solar system with orbits exclusively beyond Neptune (magenta) all mysteriously line up in a single direction. Such an orbital alignment can only be maintained by some outside force, Batygin and Brown say. Their paper argues that a planet with 10 times the mass of the earth in a distant eccentric orbit anti-aligned with the other six objects (orange) is required to maintain this configuration. Credit: Caltech The astronomers have noticed some of the dwarf planets and other small, icy objects tend to follow orbits that cluster together. To explain the unusual distribution of these Kuiper Belt objects, several authors have advocated the existence of a superEarth planet in the outer solar system ( planet Nine or planet X ).
1 comment
Read more