NEWBORN PULSARS WITH A HIDDEN MAGNETIC FIELD

Image: Crab nebula as seen by Chandra. Credit: NASA/CXC/SAO/F. Seward et al.

In the center of several supernova remnants there are pulsars with significantly lower values of the dipolar magnetic field than the average radio-pulsar population (10^{12}G). A possible explanation requires the slow rotation of the proto-neutron star at birth, which is unable to amplify its magnetic field to typical pulsar levels.

However, recent studies have shown that, even in the absence of rapid rotation, magnetic fields in pulsars can be amplified by other mechanisms such as convection and the standing accretion shock instability.
An alternative possibility, the hidden magnetic field scenario, considers the accretion of the fallback of the supernova debris onto the neutron star as responsible for the submergence (or screening) of the field and its apparently low value. A high accretion rate can compress the magnetic field of the NS which can eventually be buried into the neutron star crust. As a result, the value of the external magnetic field would be significantly lower than the internal 'hidden' magnetic field.

Credit: Torres-Forné et al. 2016

Once the accretion process stops, the magnetic field might eventually reemerge.
The main conclusion of a recent paper (Torres-Forné et al. 2016) is that typical magnetic fields of a few times 10^{12}G can be buried by accreting only 0.001-0.01 solar masses, a relatively modest amount of mass. The field would only reemerge after a few thousand years.
On the contrary, magnetar-like field strengths are much harder to screen and the required accreted mass is very large, in some cases so large that the neutron star would collapse to a black hole. The anomalously weak magnetic fields should be common in very young neutron stars.

Read more>>
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.03823v2.pdf
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/456/4/3813.abstract

Comments

A SIGNIFICATIVE FRACTION OF BARYONS RESIDE IN THE FILAMENTS OF THE COSMIC WEB

(Credit: NASA, ESA, and E. Hallman (University of Colorado, Boulder) Observations of the cosmic microwave background indicate that baryons (protons, neutrons, etc., - the ordinary matter just to understand) occupies only 5% of the total energy content of the Universe (95% is dark matter and dark energy). However in the local universe approximately half of this "ordinary" matter it has never been observed.

A UNIVERSE WITHOUT A CENTER?

Image Credit: Eugenio Bianchi, Carlo Rovelli & Rocky Kolb. According to the standard theories of cosmology, there is no center of the universe. In a conventional explosion, material expand out from a central point and the instinct suggests that with the Big Bang happened something similar. But the Big Bang was not an explosion like that at all: it was an explosion of space, not an explosion in space . The Big Bang happened everywhere in the Universe.

A Sapphire Super-Earth

Twenty-one light years away, in the constellation Cassiopeia, a planet by the name of HD219134 b orbits its star with a year that is just three days long. With a mass almost five times that of Earth, it is what is known as a super-Earth. Unlike our planet, however, these super-Earths were formed at high temperatures close to their host star and contain high quantities of calcium, aluminum and their oxides – including sapphire and ruby. HD219134 b is one of three candidates likely to belong to a new, exotic class of exoplanets. These objects are completely different from the majority of Earth-like planets. They have 10 to 20 percent lower densities than Earth. Researchers looked at different scenarios to explain the observed densities. For example, a thick atmosphere could lead to a lower overall density. But two of the exoplanets studied, 55 Cancri e and WASP-47 e, orbit their star so closely that their surface temperature is almost 3,000 degrees and they would have lost this ...

SpaceTime

Search This Blog