NEWBORN PULSARS WITH A HIDDEN MAGNETIC FIELD

Image: Crab nebula as seen by Chandra. Credit: NASA/CXC/SAO/F. Seward et al.

In the center of several supernova remnants there are pulsars with significantly lower values of the dipolar magnetic field than the average radio-pulsar population (10^{12}G). A possible explanation requires the slow rotation of the proto-neutron star at birth, which is unable to amplify its magnetic field to typical pulsar levels.

However, recent studies have shown that, even in the absence of rapid rotation, magnetic fields in pulsars can be amplified by other mechanisms such as convection and the standing accretion shock instability.
An alternative possibility, the hidden magnetic field scenario, considers the accretion of the fallback of the supernova debris onto the neutron star as responsible for the submergence (or screening) of the field and its apparently low value. A high accretion rate can compress the magnetic field of the NS which can eventually be buried into the neutron star crust. As a result, the value of the external magnetic field would be significantly lower than the internal 'hidden' magnetic field.

Credit: Torres-Forné et al. 2016

Once the accretion process stops, the magnetic field might eventually reemerge.
The main conclusion of a recent paper (Torres-Forné et al. 2016) is that typical magnetic fields of a few times 10^{12}G can be buried by accreting only 0.001-0.01 solar masses, a relatively modest amount of mass. The field would only reemerge after a few thousand years.
On the contrary, magnetar-like field strengths are much harder to screen and the required accreted mass is very large, in some cases so large that the neutron star would collapse to a black hole. The anomalously weak magnetic fields should be common in very young neutron stars.

Read more>>
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.03823v2.pdf
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/456/4/3813.abstract

Comments

ORBITAL PERIODS OF THE PLANETS

For orbital period generally we refer to the sidereal period, that is the temporal cycle that it takes an object to make a full orbit, relative to the stars. This is the orbital period in an inertial (non-rotating) frame of reference (365,25 days for the earth).

CONSTRAINTS ON THE LOCATION OF A POSSIBLE 9TH PLANET

Image: The six most distant known objects in the solar system with orbits exclusively beyond Neptune (magenta) all mysteriously line up in a single direction. Such an orbital alignment can only be maintained by some outside force, Batygin and Brown say. Their paper argues that a planet with 10 times the mass of the earth in a distant eccentric orbit anti-aligned with the other six objects (orange) is required to maintain this configuration. Credit: Caltech The astronomers have noticed some of the dwarf planets and other small, icy objects tend to follow orbits that cluster together. To explain the unusual distribution of these Kuiper Belt objects, several authors have advocated the existence of a superEarth planet in the outer solar system ( planet Nine or planet X ).

RADIATIVE CLEARING OF PROTOPLANETARY DISCS

Image: protoplanetary disc surrounding the young star HL Tauri, a very young T Tauri star in the constellation Taurus, approximately 450 light-years (140 pc) from Earth in the Taurus Molecular Cloud. These new ALMA observations reveal substructures within the disc that have never been seen before and even show the possible positions of planets forming in the dark patches within the system. Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO) T Tauri stars are pre-main-sequence stars in the process of contracting to the main sequence. Their central temperatures are too low for hydrogen fusion. Instead, they are powered by gravitational energy released as the stars contract, while moving towards the main sequence, which they reach after about 100 million years. Roughly half of T Tauri stars have circumstellar disks, which in this case are called protoplanetary discs because they are probably the progenitors of planetary systems like the Solar System.

SpaceTime

Search This Blog