Skip to main content

REMAIN SOME POSSIBILITIES FOR ALTERNATIVE THEORIES OF GRAVITY?

Image: Numerical simulations of the gravitational waves emitted by the inspiral and merger of two black holes. The colored contours around each black hole represent the amplitude of the gravitational radiation; the blue lines represent the orbits of the black holes and the green arrows represent their spins. Credit: C. Henze/NASA Ames Research Center

The observation of gravitational-wave signal by LIGO and VIRGO, corresponding to the inspiral and merger of two black holes, are consistent with the Einstein theory of gravity with high accuracy limited mainly by the statistical error.


In a recent paper (Konoplya & Zhidenko, 2016) the authors suggest that there is a number of alternative theories of gravity which produce the same black-hole behavior at far distances from their surfaces, but lead to qualitatively different features near the event horizon.

LIGO and Virgo data provide the angular momentum and mass of the final black hole with rather large allowance of tens of percents. The authors show that this indeterminacy in the range of the black-hole parameters allows for some not negligible deformations of the Kerr spacetime leading to the same frequencies of black-hole ringing. This means that at the current precision of the experiment there remain some possibilities for alternative theories of gravity.

Image: Simulation of a black hole merger. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/P. Cowperthwaite, Univ. of Maryland

Thus, they claim that there might exist a strongly deformed Kerr-like black hole, corresponding to an alternative theory of gravity, such that its behavior in the post-Newtonian regime is quite similar to Kerr black hole, while its near-horizon behavior is different.

The authors conclude that in order to disprove the above proposal, one needs to determine black-hole parameters with high accuracy. In the future this could be done either by improving the accuracy of detection of the gravitational-wave profile or with complementary observations of black holes in the electromagnetic spectrum, which could potentially give us an image of a black hole.

  • Konoplya & Zhidenko 2016 - Detection of gravitational waves from black holes: Is there a window for alternative theories? (arXiv)
  • Simulation of a black hole merger - (NASA)



Etichette:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A SIGNIFICATIVE FRACTION OF BARYONS RESIDE IN THE FILAMENTS OF THE COSMIC WEB

(Credit: NASA, ESA, and E. Hallman (University of Colorado, Boulder) Observations of the cosmic microwave background indicate that baryons (protons, neutrons, etc., - the ordinary matter just to understand) occupies only 5% of the total energy content of the Universe (95% is dark matter and dark energy). However in the local universe approximately half of this "ordinary" matter it has never been observed.
Post a Comment
Read more

A UNIVERSE WITHOUT A CENTER?

Image Credit: Eugenio Bianchi, Carlo Rovelli & Rocky Kolb. According to the standard theories of cosmology, there is no center of the universe. In a conventional explosion, material expand out from a central point and the instinct suggests that with the Big Bang happened something similar. But the Big Bang was not an explosion like that at all: it was an explosion of space, not an explosion in space . The Big Bang happened everywhere in the Universe.
Post a Comment
Read more

A Sapphire Super-Earth

Twenty-one light years away, in the constellation Cassiopeia, a planet by the name of HD219134 b orbits its star with a year that is just three days long. With a mass almost five times that of Earth, it is what is known as a super-Earth. Unlike our planet, however, these super-Earths were formed at high temperatures close to their host star and contain high quantities of calcium, aluminum and their oxides – including sapphire and ruby. HD219134 b is one of three candidates likely to belong to a new, exotic class of exoplanets. These objects are completely different from the majority of Earth-like planets. They have 10 to 20 percent lower densities than Earth. Researchers looked at different scenarios to explain the observed densities. For example, a thick atmosphere could lead to a lower overall density. But two of the exoplanets studied, 55 Cancri e and WASP-47 e, orbit their star so closely that their surface temperature is almost 3,000 degrees and they would have lost this ...
Post a Comment
Read more