A NEW EVOLUTIVE SCENARIO FOR THE JUPITER'S CORE?

Image: This artist's conception shows a Jupiter-sized planet forming from a disk of dust and gas surrounding a young, massive star. - NASA

Astronomers have discovered nearly 500 planetary systems each with multiple planets, and typically these systems include a few planets with masses several times greater than Earth's (super-Earths), orbiting closer to their star than Mercury is to the Sun, and Jupiter-like gas giants are also often found close to their star. [2]

In a recent paper (Raymond et al. 2016) the authors suggest an alternative scenario for the formation of the Jupiter's core: it may have formed in the innermost of the protoplanetary disk and it would later be migrated to the outer region via planet-disk interactions.

The migration of the Jupiter's core may have removed solids from the inner disk by resonance and it may thus explain the absence of terrestrial planets closer than Mercury. Finally it may also have influenced the formation of the Saturn's core.

[1] Raymond et al 2016 (accepted to MNRAS) - Did Jupiter's core form in the innermost parts of the Sun's protoplanetary disk? (arXiv)
[2] Jupiter - (Wikipedia)

Comments

A METHOD TO TEST THE EXISTENCE OF REGULAR BLACK HOLES

Illustration of a black hole. Image Credit & Copyright: Alain Riazuelo The existence of the singularity is an intrinsic problem of the General Relativity (GR). At the fundamentally level, the resolution of the problem of the singularity lies with the expectation that under situations where quantum effects become strong, the behavior of gravity could possibly greatly deviate from that predicted by the classical theory of GR. Regular black hole solution are proposed with the same spacetime geometry outside the horizon as the traditional black hole, but bears no singularity inside. Whether or not black hole singularities should exist, they would be covered by the black hole horizon. The black hole horizon serves as an information curtain hindering outside observers from directly observing the interior structure of the black hole, and determining that whether or not the black hole singularity does really exist. A method is needed to check the correctness of the new constructions ...

A BINARY ORIGIN FOR A CENTRAL COMPACT OBJECT (CCO)?

Figure: False-Colour X-ray and infrared emission image from the core of the infrared shell. The RGB colours correspond to Chandra X-ray 0.2-10 keV (blue), IRAC infrared 8 μm (green), and HPACS 70 μm (red) data. The intensity scale is logarithmic for all channels. Overlaid are equal brightness levels from the MIPS 24 μm band. Note that around the CCO the infrared emission is suppressed in the 70 μm band and enhanced in the 24 μm band suggesting higher dust temperature. Credit: Doroshenko et al 2016 Central compact objects (CCOs) are thought to be young isolated neutron stars that were born during the preceding core-collapse supernova explosion.

BOUNCING BLACK HOLES

Image: Illustration of a dusty supermassive black hole. Credit: ESA/NASA, the AVO project and Paolo Padovani Black holes could be bouncing stars as a consequence of quantum gravity: when the density of matter becomes high enough, quantum gravity effects generate sufficient pressure to compensate the matter's weight, the collapse ends, and matter bounces out. In a black hole, matter's collapse could stop before the central singularity is formed.

SpaceTime

Search This Blog