TESTING THE SPEED OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES OVER COSMOLOGICAL DISTANCES

Image: Merging black holes ripple space and time in this artist's concept. Credit: Swinburne Astronomy Productions

On September 14, 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC the two detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) observed a transient gravitational-wave signal from a black hole-black hole binary (BHBH) inspiral.

The Fermi gamma ray burst monitor revealed the presence of a possible electromagnetic counterpart (Connaughton et al. 2016): a weak transient source above 50 keV, 0.4 s after the GW event was detected with a false alarm probability of 0.0022. The spatial location of both events are poorly determined but mutually consistent.

If the EM and GW signals are related to the same transient phenomenon this opens up a new physical window with which to test the relative speeds of light and gravitational waves.

Several of the alternative theories of gravity invoked to explain the accelerated expansion of the Universe predict c_GW ≠ c_light. In a recent paper (Collett & Bacon 2016) the authors assume that the EM and GW are emitted at the same instant and they obtain a constraint on the ratio of the speeds of light and gravitational waves at the level of 10⁻¹⁷.

The assumption that the electromagnetic and gravitational wave emissions are emitted at the same time is a strong one, so they suggest a method that does not make such an assumption using a strongly lensed GW event and EM counterpart. They show that a single strongly lensed GW event would produce robust constraints at the 10⁻⁷ level, if a high energy EM counterpart is observed within the field-of-view of an observing gamma ray burst monitor.

Collett & Bacon 2016 - Testing the speed of gravitational waves over cosmological distances with strong gravitational lensing (arXiv)
Connaughton et al. 2016 - Fermi GBM Observations of LIGO Gravitational Wave event GW150914 (arXiv)

Comments

A METHOD TO TEST THE EXISTENCE OF REGULAR BLACK HOLES

Illustration of a black hole. Image Credit & Copyright: Alain Riazuelo The existence of the singularity is an intrinsic problem of the General Relativity (GR). At the fundamentally level, the resolution of the problem of the singularity lies with the expectation that under situations where quantum effects become strong, the behavior of gravity could possibly greatly deviate from that predicted by the classical theory of GR. Regular black hole solution are proposed with the same spacetime geometry outside the horizon as the traditional black hole, but bears no singularity inside. Whether or not black hole singularities should exist, they would be covered by the black hole horizon. The black hole horizon serves as an information curtain hindering outside observers from directly observing the interior structure of the black hole, and determining that whether or not the black hole singularity does really exist. A method is needed to check the correctness of the new constructions ...

ORBITAL PERIODS OF THE PLANETS

For orbital period generally we refer to the sidereal period, that is the temporal cycle that it takes an object to make a full orbit, relative to the stars. This is the orbital period in an inertial (non-rotating) frame of reference (365,25 days for the earth).

Importance of Supernovae in the Enrichment of Planetary Systems

Figure: Called the Veil Nebula, the debris is one of the best-known supernova remnants, deriving its name from its delicate, draped filamentary structures. This view is a mosaic of six Hubble pictures of a small area roughly two light-years across, covering only a tiny fraction of the nebula’s vast structure. Credit: NASA/ESA/Hubble Heritage Team The presence and abundance of short lived radioisotopes in chondritic meteorites implies that the Sun formed in the vicinity of one or more massive stars that exploded as supernovae (SNe).

SpaceTime

Search This Blog