ARE THE TWO BLACK HOLES OBSERVED BY LIGO PRODUCED FROM THE COLLAPSE OF A SINGLE STAR?

Image: Simulation of two colliding black holes. Animation created by SXS, the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) project (http://www.black-holes.org) - Caltech LIGO

If the GW signal observed by LIGO is due to the merger of two isolated black holes (BHs) in vacuum, no electromagnetic counterparts are expected. However, Fermi observed a signal 0.4 s after LIGO in a region of space compatible with the GW source.

A recent paper (Loeb 2016) suggests that the two black holes could be the result of the collapse of a single massive and rapidly rotating star. In this scenario the GRB is produced from a jet generated in the accretion disk of residual debris around the black hole or from an outflow generating by the BHs' merging.

The detection of a GRB afterglow in the future could be used to determine the precise localization of the electromagnetic source and eventually confirm the association to the GW source.

Loeb 2016 (accepted for publication in ApJ Letters) - Electromagnetic Counterparts to Black Hole Mergers Detected by LIGO (arXiv)

Comments

A Sapphire Super-Earth

Twenty-one light years away, in the constellation Cassiopeia, a planet by the name of HD219134 b orbits its star with a year that is just three days long. With a mass almost five times that of Earth, it is what is known as a super-Earth. Unlike our planet, however, these super-Earths were formed at high temperatures close to their host star and contain high quantities of calcium, aluminum and their oxides – including sapphire and ruby. HD219134 b is one of three candidates likely to belong to a new, exotic class of exoplanets. These objects are completely different from the majority of Earth-like planets. They have 10 to 20 percent lower densities than Earth. Researchers looked at different scenarios to explain the observed densities. For example, a thick atmosphere could lead to a lower overall density. But two of the exoplanets studied, 55 Cancri e and WASP-47 e, orbit their star so closely that their surface temperature is almost 3,000 degrees and they would have lost this ...

ORBITAL PERIODS OF THE PLANETS

For orbital period generally we refer to the sidereal period, that is the temporal cycle that it takes an object to make a full orbit, relative to the stars. This is the orbital period in an inertial (non-rotating) frame of reference (365,25 days for the earth).

Hubble observes energetic lightshow at Saturn’s north pole

This image is a composite of observations made of Saturn in early 2018 in the optical and of the auroras on Saturn’s north pole region, made in 2017. In contrast to the auroras on Earth the auroras on Saturn are only visible in the ultraviolet — a part of the electromagnetic spectrum blocked by Earth’s atmosphere — and therefore astronomers have to rely on space telescopes like the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope to study them. Credit: ESA/Hubble, NASA, A. Simon (GSFC) and the OPAL Team, J. DePasquale (STScI), L. Lamy (Observatoire de Paris) In 2017, over a period of seven months, the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope took images of auroras above Saturn’s north pole region using the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph. The observations were taken before and after the Saturnian northern summer solstice. These conditions provided the best achievable viewing of the northern auroral region for Hubble. On Earth, auroras are mainly created by particles or...

SpaceTime

Search This Blog