ARE THE TWO BLACK HOLES OBSERVED BY LIGO PRODUCED FROM THE COLLAPSE OF A SINGLE STAR?

Image: Simulation of two colliding black holes. Animation created by SXS, the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) project (http://www.black-holes.org) - Caltech LIGO

If the GW signal observed by LIGO is due to the merger of two isolated black holes (BHs) in vacuum, no electromagnetic counterparts are expected. However, Fermi observed a signal 0.4 s after LIGO in a region of space compatible with the GW source.

A recent paper (Loeb 2016) suggests that the two black holes could be the result of the collapse of a single massive and rapidly rotating star. In this scenario the GRB is produced from a jet generated in the accretion disk of residual debris around the black hole or from an outflow generating by the BHs' merging.

The detection of a GRB afterglow in the future could be used to determine the precise localization of the electromagnetic source and eventually confirm the association to the GW source.

Loeb 2016 (accepted for publication in ApJ Letters) - Electromagnetic Counterparts to Black Hole Mergers Detected by LIGO (arXiv)

Comments

‘Monster’ Planet Discovery Challenges Formation Theory

Artist’s illustration of a "hot Jupiter". Image Credit: NASA/CXC/M. Weiss A new research presents the discovery of NGTS-1b, a hot-Jupiter transiting an early M-dwarf host in a P~2.6 days orbit discovered as part of the Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS). The planet has a mass of M~0.8 M(jupiter) making it the most massive planet ever discovered transiting an M-dwarf. NGTS-1b is the third transiting giant planet found around an M-dwarf, reinforcing the notion that close-in gas giants can form and migrate similar to the known population of hot Jupiters around solar type stars. The existence of the 'monster' planet, 'NGTS-1b', challenges theories of planet formation which state that a planet of this size could not be formed around such a small star. According to these theories, small stars can readily form rocky planets but do not gather enough material together to form Jupiter-sized planets. Such massive planets were not thought to exist ar...

ORBITAL PERIODS OF THE PLANETS

For orbital period generally we refer to the sidereal period, that is the temporal cycle that it takes an object to make a full orbit, relative to the stars. This is the orbital period in an inertial (non-rotating) frame of reference (365,25 days for the earth).

CONSTRAINTS ON THE LOCATION OF A POSSIBLE 9TH PLANET

Image: The six most distant known objects in the solar system with orbits exclusively beyond Neptune (magenta) all mysteriously line up in a single direction. Such an orbital alignment can only be maintained by some outside force, Batygin and Brown say. Their paper argues that a planet with 10 times the mass of the earth in a distant eccentric orbit anti-aligned with the other six objects (orange) is required to maintain this configuration. Credit: Caltech The astronomers have noticed some of the dwarf planets and other small, icy objects tend to follow orbits that cluster together. To explain the unusual distribution of these Kuiper Belt objects, several authors have advocated the existence of a superEarth planet in the outer solar system ( planet Nine or planet X ).

SpaceTime

Search This Blog