Skip to main content

STELLAR MASS GROWTH OF SPIRAL GALAXIES IN THE COSMIC WEB


Image: An illustration of the cosmic web. Credit: NASA/NCSA University of Illinois Visualization by Frank Summers, Space Telescope Science Institute, Simulation by Martin White and Lars Hernquist, Harvard University

The distribution of galaxies in the Universe forms a vast network of interconnected filamentary structures, sheets, and clusters which are separated by immense voids. This vast foam-like structure sometimes is called the "cosmic web".
The filamentary arrangement of galaxies is a direct consequence of perturbations in the initial density field of matter shortly after the Big Bang evolving under the influence of gravity over cosmic time.

A recent paper (Alpaslan et al. 2016, MNRAS) investigates the correlated changes in stellar mass and star formation rate along filaments in the cosmic web by examining the stellar masses and UV-derived star formation rates (SFR) of 1,799 spiral galaxies that reside in filaments.


Image: Galaxies, composed of gas, stars and dark matter, collide and form filaments in the large-scale universe Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center and the Advanced Visualization Laboratoy at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications

The authors find that galaxies closer to the cylindrical centre of a filament have higher stellar masses than their counterparts near the periphery of filaments, on the edges of voids. In addition, these peripheral spiral galaxies have higher specific star formation rates (SSFR) at a given mass.

As expected, stellar mass of a spiral galaxy plays a dominant role in determining its star formation rate, but the authors find also that the distributions of the star formation rates vary with large-scale environment. For this reason, in addition to stellar mass as the primary discriminant, the large-scale environment is imprinted in the SFR as a second order effect.

Finally, their results suggest a model in which gas accretion from voids onto filaments is primarily in an orthogonal direction.



Related posts



Etichette:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A SIGNIFICATIVE FRACTION OF BARYONS RESIDE IN THE FILAMENTS OF THE COSMIC WEB

(Credit: NASA, ESA, and E. Hallman (University of Colorado, Boulder) Observations of the cosmic microwave background indicate that baryons (protons, neutrons, etc., - the ordinary matter just to understand) occupies only 5% of the total energy content of the Universe (95% is dark matter and dark energy). However in the local universe approximately half of this "ordinary" matter it has never been observed.
Post a Comment
Read more

A UNIVERSE WITHOUT A CENTER?

Image Credit: Eugenio Bianchi, Carlo Rovelli & Rocky Kolb. According to the standard theories of cosmology, there is no center of the universe. In a conventional explosion, material expand out from a central point and the instinct suggests that with the Big Bang happened something similar. But the Big Bang was not an explosion like that at all: it was an explosion of space, not an explosion in space . The Big Bang happened everywhere in the Universe.
Post a Comment
Read more

A Sapphire Super-Earth

Twenty-one light years away, in the constellation Cassiopeia, a planet by the name of HD219134 b orbits its star with a year that is just three days long. With a mass almost five times that of Earth, it is what is known as a super-Earth. Unlike our planet, however, these super-Earths were formed at high temperatures close to their host star and contain high quantities of calcium, aluminum and their oxides – including sapphire and ruby. HD219134 b is one of three candidates likely to belong to a new, exotic class of exoplanets. These objects are completely different from the majority of Earth-like planets. They have 10 to 20 percent lower densities than Earth. Researchers looked at different scenarios to explain the observed densities. For example, a thick atmosphere could lead to a lower overall density. But two of the exoplanets studied, 55 Cancri e and WASP-47 e, orbit their star so closely that their surface temperature is almost 3,000 degrees and they would have lost this ...
Post a Comment
Read more